I, Robot Film Essay

I, Robot, cosmos the film released in 2004, has gained the huge popularity of the audience and the approval of some(prenominal) critics. In fact, the opening weekend proved to be very successful for the film that indicates to the huge arouse of the public. In this respect, it is worth mentioning the fact that I, Robot has a budget $120,000,000 and the opening weekend in the US only has brought over $52 mln. (I, Robot, 2008). In much(prenominal) a way, it is possible to estimate that the film was basically very successful since it still remains quite popular, especially among connoisseurs of science-fiction. Obviously, the popularity of the film and the interest of the pubic is non only the result of a successful promotional campaign and celebrities starring in the film, but it is generally due to the quality of the film that made I, Robot so popular and successful. In this respect, it should be verbalise that I, Robot is a film focused on the problem of technologies of figur e. Speaking about the plot of the film, it should be said that the action takes place in 2035 when robots atomic number 18 widely used as assistance of gracious beings.In such a situation the main character, Chicago Police Detective Del Spooner (Will Smith) seems to be a bit paranoid because he is a kind of robotophobic. Strangely enough but it is him who is appointed to check out the murder of Dr. Alfred Lanning (James Cromwell) who works at US Robotics. The number one suspect is a Nestor single out 5 robot who calls himself Sonny. This is where the paradox and the main dilemma appears if Sonny really has get the better ofed a military man, than he possesses disposition and he female genitalia think and act independently from a humankind. Consequently if all this is true than robots provoke easily raise against their human masters and establish total control over the world. custom essays In such a way, the main theme of the film is revealed through the opposition of robot s that gained consciousness and human beings who sullen from masters that controlled not only robots but everything in the world and in their invigoration into beings who have openhanded to become completely dependent upon their robots (Wilson 2002388).In fact this lead to the logical question the audience has to reaction at what point does artificial intelligence cease to be artificial and true consciousness modernize? (Wilson 2002389). Moreover, it is not less important to realize the consequences of such a shift in the machines created due to the roughly sophisticated technologies mankind possesses. The director of the film successfully used the scenes where the large masses of robots atomic number 18 shown resembling a kind of army which is able to destroy the mankind as soon as it goes out of humans control. At this point the scenes in which robots attack human being are particularly noteworthy. Even though the director of the film probably pays too much attention of a ction scenes and forcefulness, but still this violence does not seem to be excessive. Instead, it is intentionally used to demonstrate the power of the machines created by earthly concern and which rebelled against populace domination.In such a situation, the first robot that actually started to act differently, i.e. the robot, who has gone out of control of macrocosm, resembles a kind of Frankenstein, a creature that rebels against its creator. On the other hand, the robot does not produce an dead negative impression. In fact, the robot provokes rather controversial feelings since the only problem of the robot is its actions which are harm and which are not conditioned by humans, but which, on the other hand, are too human. In such a way, the rebellion of robots may be viewed in the context of comparison of humans with robots. The latter(prenominal) rebel against humans but they behave in a similar way as humans do, the only thing they want to change is to accomplish humans e fforts to create meliorate creatures and create the perfect world.However, the film reveals the fact that in such an idealized world there is no room for humans that are too imperfect and their strife for perfection is just their vanity and an attempt to play God. In this respect, the main character is quite symbolic since he comprises vices which cannot be attributed to a real hero that is suppositional to save the world from robots. In actuality, Del Spooner is a bit paranoid person who has some inexplicable phobic neurosis of robots and machines, a person who lives practically in the permanent state of fear. On the other hand, he is crap to face all the challenges in his life and he is ready to struggle.The main problem is whether humans can control their technologies and what are the consequences of the unplanned technological progress. Probably, the question is even more general what human beings are and whether they can create working machines with high intelligence and re main safe. The director poses an eternal question what human beings are and willingly or not a viewer may have got an impression that humans are also someones creatures, as robots in I, Robot. I RobotI robot is a photographic film based on the works of an atheistic man, in which there are many theological themes present, which play toward the same questions we ask about our faith each and every day.I Robot is a movie based on the works of Victor Asimnov, a man who wrote several(prenominal) short stories about robots and human kinds interaction. The movie takes place in futuristic Chicago in the twelvemonth 2035, at a time there are so many robots, that there will soon be one of them in each home. The story revolves around detective Del Spooner (Will Smith), a homicide detective who hates robots. The modestness being that he had a bad experience with them, ever since a robot saved his life in a car accident when it could have saved a young girl instead.The movie starts off when the scientist who repaired Will Smith after the accident, named Alfred Lanning, is found dead in the lobby of the U.S. Robotics office tower. Del Spooner (Will Smith) assumes that the scientists death was not a suicide attempt, but a murder committed by a robot named Sonny. Everyone tells Spooner that hes crazy, because robots cannot go against the three laws by which they are to abide by at any cost. THE THREE LAWS OF ROBOTICSA robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. A robot must accompany orders given it by human beings, except where such orders would contravene with the First Law. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the first and second rule.Every robot is programmed to protect humans at all costs, and to obey them unless such obedience would harm a human life. Spooner very much doubts this because various robots keep trying to kill him, from a home-demolition robot, to a wh ole truckload of metal men that ambush him while he drives through a highway tunnel. The story continues, and the new robots go on a rampage, even